Archive for December, 2007

The Future of California

With all the talk on global warming, it is becoming difficult to make sense of the horrifying projections of our environment’s future. The article below from AP argues that within the next century California will look drastically different. In a nut shell, rising temperatures will decrease snowfall levels and subsequently our water supply. It only briefly mentions the potential fighting between cities and counties over water supply–I see this as being the issue of the century. Well, of course, there is oil, but without water we can’t live and it only worsens the problems we will face with a shortage of oil. Water feeds California’s agricultural and cattle industry. I’m not pushing for a vegan utopia (see the Omnivore’s Dilemma for a good analysis of this), but I do believe that our push for the mass production of beef is wasteful. It takes 2.6 pounds of grains and 435 gallons of water to produce one pound of beef. This doesn’t include how much water is required to produce the 2.6 pounds of grain.

I read the AP article for clues on where I should move to avoid my house falling into the ocean (hint–don’t live in Malibu), but I’ve decided that I need a good plot of land where I can grow my own food and have a well for my own water. However, I now have the problem of affording that land and maintaining a career as a professor. Any ideas? Maybe those hippie communes weren’t such a bad idea…

Global Warming to Alter Calif. Landscape

By NOAKI SCHWARTZ, The Associated Press
2007-12-29 20:04:07.0
LOS ANGELES -

California is defined by its scenery, from the mountains that enchanted John Muir to the wine country and beaches that define its culture around the world.

But as scientists try to forecast how global warming might affect the nation’s most geographically diverse state, they envision a landscape that could look quite different by the end of this century, if not sooner.

Where celebrities, surfers and wannabes mingle on Malibu’s world-famous beaches, there may be only sea walls defending fading mansions from the encroaching Pacific. In Northern California, tourists could have to drive farther north or to the cool edge of the Pacific to find what is left of the region’s signature wine country.

Abandoned ski lifts might dangle above snowless trails more suitable for mountain biking even during much of the winter. In the deserts, Joshua trees that once extended their tangled, shaggy arms into the sky by the thousands may have all but disappeared.

“We need to be attentive to the fact that changes are going to occur, whether it’s sea level rising or increased temperatures, droughts and potentially increased fires,” said Lisa Sloan, a scientist who directs the Climate Change and Impacts Laboratory at the University of California, Santa Cruz. “These things are going to be happening.”

Among the earliest and most noticeable casualties is expected to be California’s ski season.

Snow is expected to fall for a shorter period and melt more quickly. That could shorten the ski season by a month even in wetter areas and perhaps end it in others.

Whether from short-term drought or long-term changes, the ski season already has begun to shrivel in Southern California, ringed by mountain ranges that cradle several winter resorts.

“There’s always plenty of snow, but you may just have to go out of state for it,” said Rinda Wohlwend, 62, who belongs to two ski clubs in Southern California. “I’m a very avid tennis player, so I’d probably play more tennis.”

Because California has myriad microclimates, covering an area a third larger than Italy, predicting what will happen by the end of the century is a challenge.

But through a series of interviews with scientists who are studying the phenomenon, a general description of the state’s future emerges.

By the end of the century, temperatures are predicted to increase by 3 to 10 degrees Fahrenheit statewide. That could translate into even less rainfall across the southern half of the state, already under pressure from the increased frequency of wildfires and relentless population growth.

Small mammals, reptiles and colonies of wildflowers in the deserts east of Los Angeles are accustomed to periodic three-year dry spells. But they might not be able to withstand the 10-year drought cycles that could become commonplace as the planet warms.

Scientists already are considering relocating Joshua tree seedlings to areas where the plants, a hallmark of the high desert and namesake of a national park, might survive climate change.

“They could be wiped out of California depending on how quickly the change happens,” said Cameron Barrows, who studies the effects of climate change for the Center for Conservation Biology in Riverside.

Farther north, where wet, cold winters are crucial for the water supply of the entire state, warmer temperatures will lead to more rain than snow in the Sierra Nevada and faster melting in the spring.

Because 35 percent of the state’s water supply is stored annually in the Sierra snowpack, changes to that hydrologic system will lead to far-reaching consequences for California and its ever-growing population.

Some transformations already are apparent, from the Sierra high country to the great valleys that have made California the nation’s top agricultural state.

The snow line is receding, as it is in many other alpine regions around the world. Throughout the 400-mile-long Sierra, trees are under stress, leading scientists to speculate that the mix of flora could change significantly as the climate warms. The death rate of fir and pine trees has accelerated over the past two decades.

In the central and southern Sierra, the giant sequoias that are among the biggest living things on Earth might be imperiled.

“I suspect as things get warmer, we’ll start seeing sequoias just die on their feet where their foliage turns brown,” said Nate Stephenson, a U.S. Geological Survey ecologist who is studying the effects of climate change in the Sierra Nevada. “Even if they don’t die of drought stress, just think of the wildfires. If you dry out that vegetation, they’re going to be so much more flammable.”

Changes in the mountain snowpack could lead to expensive water disputes between cities and farmers. Without consistent water from rivers draining the melting snow, farmers in the Central and Salinas valleys could lose as much as a quarter of their water supply.

Any drastic changes to the state’s $30 billion agriculture industry would have national implications, since California’s fertile valleys provide half the country’s fresh fruits, nuts and vegetables, according to the Union of Concerned Scientists’ study.

“Obviously, it’s going to mean that choices are going to be made about who’s going to get the water,” said Brian Nowicki, a biologist with the Center for Biological Diversity in Tucson, Ariz.

Among the biggest unknowns is what will happen along California’s coast as the world’s ice sheets and glaciers melt. One scenario suggests the sea level could rise by more than 20 feet.

Will the rising sea swamp the ports of Long Beach and Los Angeles, the nation’s busiest harbor complex, turning them into a series of saltwater lakes? Will funky Ocean Beach, an island of liberalism in conservative San Diego County, become, literally, its own island?

Among the more sobering projections is what is in store for marine life.

The upwelling season, the time when nutrient-rich water is brought from the ocean’s depths to the surface, nourishes one of the world’s richest marine environments.

That period, from late spring until early fall, is expected to become weaker earlier in the season and more intense later. Upwelling along the Southern California coast will become weaker overall.

As a result, sea lions, blue whales and other marine mammals that follow these systems up and down the coast are expected to decline.

The changing sea will present trouble for much of the state’s land-dwelling population, too. A sea level rise of 3 to 6 feet would inundate the airports in San Francisco and Oakland. Many of the state’s beaches would shrink.

“If you raise sea level by a foot, you push a cliff back 100 feet,” said Jeff Severinghaus, professor of geosciences at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography in San Diego. “There will be a lot of houses that will fall into the ocean.”

Merry Christmas

xmastree.jpgMy family may be small, but it is rare for us all to be together on Christmas. Therefore, on this amazing occasion I would like to wish you all a Merry Christmas.

We had the usual debate about buying a tree five minutes before we were off to cut one down. By the end of it we decided that plastic trees are wasteful and mass-produced Christmas trees are an environmental no-no. My dad was quick to note that he does not burn the tree after Christmas–it is placed in the yard to decompose (they live in the mountains where redwood trees landscape the backyard). With that said, we felt content to buy a tree from a local tree farm. This photo shows the tree we rescued from the farm. Do you think the angel is too much? I have to say that all of these rituals–buying a tree, decorating the tree, and opening presents beneath the tree are all centered around my nephew. Having children around puts me in the Christmas spirit. Without my nephew, our Christmas spirit would amount to drinking spiked cider and going out for Chinese food on Christmas day.

I am not sure how my fellow graduate student colleagues manage to do any work with a child around. I find myself intrigued by silly games, magnets, and reading 10-page books all day long. And the day goes by quickly with children around. When I read Belle’s post about her trip home it made me realize that I am guilt-fully neglecting my own work–that never ending work we do as graduate students. Oh well, it is only for one more day and I should enjoy it while I can.

Increasing Inequality under NAFTA

From IPS:

CHALLENGES 2007-2008: Lowering Mexico’s Drawbridge to US Maize and Beans
By Diego Cevallos

MEXICO CITY, Dec 19 (IPS) - On Jan. 1, the Mexican market will be thrown wide open to imports of maize, beans, powdered milk and sugar from the United States, completing a process that began 14 years ago, in which its impoverished rural sector must compete with a powerful and heavily subsidised foreign rival.

The freeing up of Mexico’s agricultural markets has been happening gradually since 1994, when the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) between Canada, Mexico and the United States came into effect.

The date agreed for the final stage of this process was 2008. It was expected that by then Mexico would be able to cope with the removal of quotas and tariffs for imported maize and beans, the staple foods of most people in this country and an important part of their ancestral traditions.

However, with just a few days to go before the last trade barriers are dismantled, there is obvious asymmetry between the markets, especially with that of the United States, with which Mexico does 90 percent of its trade.

Maize originated in Mexico, which produces 19 million tonnes a year, compared to 300 million tonnes a year grown in the United States.

For a Mexican farmer, the cost of growing a hectare of maize is 300 times higher, and the yield 3.5 times lower, than for a farmer in the U.S., according to the non-governmental National Campesino (small farmer) Federation (CNC).

But every farmer in the U.S. is subsidised to the tune of an average 20,000 dollars a year, while in Mexico government subsidies are no more than an annual 770 dollars per farmer, the CNC says.

In the U.S., 32 million hectares are devoted to maize, used for human food and animal feed, and also to produce ethanol, a biofuel. In Mexico maize is grown on 8.5 million hectares.

“The claws of free trade will grab us by the throat in 2008 and strangle us, and the government is doing nothing about it. It just says it has to fulfil its pledge, but that will be at the expense of poor farmers who can’t compete,” Mariano Sánchez, a medium-sized bean grower in Mexico state, near the capital, told IPS.

In actual fact, NAFTA is not so much a free trade treaty as an agreement to eliminate tariff barriers. Dismantling domestic subsidies is an issue that continues to be negotiated at the World Trade Organisation (WTO), where talks are blocked because of the refusal of rich nations to stop subsidising their farmers.

“The farming sector in Mexico was never ready for NAFTA and is still not ready, in spite of all the support the authorities say they have given,” said Sánchez, who produces beans on 15 hectares of land, and sells them to local markets. He says he has steady buyers, but fears he will lose them if lower priced imported beans become available.

Twenty million people out of a total Mexican population of 109 million live in the countryside, and 75 percent of them are poor. Barely one-third of agricultural labourers have employment benefits, and there is constant migration of the work force towards Mexican cities and the United States.

Of the country’s 31 million hectares of cultivated land, less than one million produce crops for export. The rest is used to grow food largely for subsistence, with the surplus being sold on the domestic market.

Even so, more than 50 percent of the cucumber and 90 percent of lemons and mangoes consumed in the U.S. come from Mexico.

One out of six watermelons, one-quarter of melons and asparagus and one-third of the tomatoes bought by consumers in the U.S. are also from Mexico, according to government figures.

About 50 campesino organisations and groups of activists opposed to free trade have joined forces in the National Campaign in Defence of Food Sovereignty and the Revitalisation of Rural Mexico, under the banner Sin maíz no hay país, sin frijol tampoco” (roughly: no maize means no Mexico, and so does no beans).

They have carried out a number of actions aimed at stopping the opening of the market for these essential agricultural products, so far without success.

Over 1,100 agricultural products from the U.S. and Canada can already be imported duty-free into Mexico, and the same is true of the vast majority of Mexican products sold to those countries.

Nearly all quotas and tariffs have been removed. All that remain are the protective barriers for the most sensitive products — maize, beans, powdered milk and sugar — which were left until last.

The government of conservative President Felipe Calderón says that Jan. 1 will not in any way be a dire day for Mexico.

Mexico already imports increasing amounts of maize and beans from the U.S., because it ceased to be self-sufficient in both products almost a decade ago. Therefore the regional open market is already a fact, some observers say.

The elimination of Mexico’s tariff barriers for maize is due to occur at a time when there is high international demand and high world prices for the commodity. Experts say that Mexicans will have no difficulty selling their maize, locally or for export.

Mexico produces an annual surplus of 200,000 tonnes of sugar, and the imminent change in trade rules is not expected to have a major impact on this sector.

The U.S. imports sugar, and could buy it from Mexico, says governing National Action Party (PAN) lawmaker Francisco Domínguez, an agricultural expert.

The local dairy industry, however, cannot fully satisfy local demand, and is at a technological disadvantage compared to producers in the U.S., so it could face stiff competition.

Marco Ramos, an agricultural researcher at the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM), says that all Mexico’s rural problems should not be blamed “on NAFTA and free trade.”

“That’s an overly simplistic view that leaves out hard data indicating that failure in the rural sector is due to several causes,” he said.

A study published in 2005 by Braulio Serna, of the local office of the Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), says that NAFTA has not had a quantitatively significant impact on Mexico’s rural sector.

Analyses claiming that opening the market has been the determining factor in Mexican agricultural performance are biased, according to Serna.

The problems of the rural sector, poverty and migration are more directly linked to misguided public policies, global and national economic crises, climatic factors, low levels of technical training among farmers, and the low international commodity prices seen until a few years ago, among other things, the ECLAC expert said.

Government support for the Mexican countryside has increased in the past few years and comprises subsidies, technical support, preferential prices and investment in rural infrastructure.

This year, government spending amounted to some 16 billion dollars, 1.5 billion dollars more than in 2006. And in 2008 funding for rural areas is expected to reach 19 billion dollars.

However, most of the rural areas remain in poverty and overall production has not improved, although there are some successful export sectors.

The backing given by the Mexican state to its farmers does not match the 22 billion dollars that the U.S. gives its producers in direct subsidies alone, without taking into account the substantial additional aid they receive for marketing, technology and infrastructure.

NAFTA opponents organising the National Campaign in Defence of Food Sovereignty complained that, from January, “campesinos will have to defend themselves on their own against U.S. products which are subsidised at a level 30 times higher than the average amounts granted by the Mexican government.”

“The ingenuousness, incompetence and collusion of the federal government and many legislators have prevented them from discerning that, hidden behind this new stage of the trade agreement, a true war is being waged against our survival as an independent country,” the members of the National Campaign said in an open letter released on Dec. 10.

Delegates from the groups involved in the campaign went on a four-day hunger strike in mid-December, calling for a renegotiation of NAFTA, and announced that they would blockade border crossings to the U.S. from Jan. 1 if their demands are not addressed.

“The campaign against open markets will not change the situation. The best thing to do is to put regrets aside, and look within to find out what can be done so that rural areas in Mexico can develop,” said Ramos. (END/2007)

APPO Music On-line

I just stumbled upon this blog, by FPR Oaxaca who kindly posted a few APPO en resistencia music. Most interestingly, are two counter-infomercials that respond to Governor Ruiz’s campaign that labeled APPO as “urban guerilla warfare.” The track labeled Bazzokeros chronicles the events of November 25, 2006. I collected several CDs and DVDs about the Oaxacan movement while I was there and as someone writing about this movement, I am happy to see some of it provided on the internet. This blog also has a previous post featuring some other songs. You can download them onto your computer.

From FPR’s 11/26 post (if you go to the site you can download the music):

Segunda entrega de musica del movimiento popular Oaxaqueño, surgida durante los dias gloriosos de la Comuna de Oaxaca. Cada una de ellas fue realizada como una necesidad que tenia el movimiento, asi, la tematica de cada uno de los info-contracomerciales como de las canciones gira en torno a un evento y en un contexto determinado:

Los contra-informerciales por ejemplo son una respuesta a la campaña mediatica que emprendio URO en contra de la APPO calificandola de “guerrilla urbana”.

Resistencia Oaxaqueña, fue un llamado al magisterio y al pueblo a reforzar la lucha cuando se cernia sobre nuestras cabezas la amenaza de represion. Consulta amañada se refiere a la consulta manipulada que realizo la dirigencia de la Seccion 22 para desmovilizar a las bases del magisterio.

Bazzokeros es una cronica sobre lo ocurrido el 25 de noviembre de 2006, dia de la mas cruel represion en contra del pueblo de Mexico en las ultimas decadas. Por ultimo, a las barricadas en primera fila, es un llamado/instructivo al pueblo de Oaxaca para prepararse en lucha de barricadas para rechazar a los convoyes de la muerte, que noche con noche agredian al pueblo de Oaxaca.

Esperamos disfruten esta seleccionen musical, cualquier sugerencia les agradeceriamos enviarla a fpr_oaxaca@yahoo.com.mx

If you want to see photos from the Oaxacan movement, please don’t forget to check out my photos page.

Because I miss Oaxaca

Because I miss Oaxaca and this song makes me think of it, I share it with you. For some reason, this video was played about once an hour on the television for several months in Mexico. I can now listen to it without going crazy only because I have had some time away. It is a nice song…

YouTube Preview Image

“Perfecta” by Miranda!

New Documentary about APPO

Un Poquito de Tanto Verdad by Corrugated Films is now available for purchase. I just ordered my copy of Jill Friedberg’s new film, but I already viewed it in Oaxaca. It focuses on APPO’s use of alternative media, from COMO’s take-over of state television and radio stations to the use of their own radio stations. It is an interesting portrayal, albeit an obviously positive portrayal of this complicated movement. I recommend it for anyone who would like to learn more about APPO or the role of media in social movements. I also believe it would be an asset in any social movement classroom. I am especially intrigued by the role of women in the movement who have great insight into their own role and power in making change. I’ve met many of the people in the film and I am happy to see their voices made public in this format. My only suggestion is not to use any one film, including this one, as your only source for knowledge about APPO.

Plea Deal for One of the Jena 6

from the LA Times, December 4, 2007:

‘Jena Six’ teen enters plea deal

Mychal Bell, 17, pleads guilty to a juvenile charge of second-degree battery in the case that drew national attention to a Louisiana town. A conspiracy charge is dropped.

By Howard Witt, Chicago Tribune
December 4, 2007

HOUSTON — The district attorney in the racially charged “Jena Six” case in Louisiana agreed to a plea bargain Monday that sharply reduced the charges against the first of the six black teenagers facing trial, while lawyers for other defendants said the prosecutor appeared eager to settle their cases as well.

LaSalle Parish Dist. Atty. Reed Walters, whose initial decision to charge the black teenagers with attempted murder for beating a white youth was condemned as excessive by civil rights leaders, dropped a conspiracy charge against Mychal Bell, 17, and agreed to let him plead guilty to a juvenile charge of second-degree battery, with a sentence of 18 months and credit for time served.

District Judge J.P. Mauffray approved the plea agreement just three days before Bell’s trial in juvenile court was to start. Bell’s lawyers said Walters offered them the plea agreement Thursday, a week after a coalition of U.S. media companies, led by the Chicago Tribune and including the Los Angeles Times, successfully sued Mauffray to force him to open the trial to the public and the media.

“This case has been a very difficult chapter in the town’s life and for the individuals involved,” said David Utter, a lawyer for another of the Jena Six defendants, who was charged as a juvenile. “My sense is that the district attorney would like to close this chapter now.”

Utter and lawyers for several other Jena Six defendants confirmed that they were engaged in plea negotiations with the district attorney, heralding a potential conclusion to the case that drew more than 20,000 protesters to Jena in September and earned the small Louisiana town a portrayal by civil rights leaders and the national media as a racist backwater.

The decision to reduce the charges against Bell was the latest turnabout for Walters, who had vowed to aggressively prosecute the six black youths for their alleged roles in jumping Justin Barker as he emerged from the gymnasium at Jena High School on Dec. 4, 2006, and kicking him while he lay unconscious.

The incident capped months of racial unrest in the town, set off when three white students hung nooses from a tree traditionally used by whites at the high school after black students sought permission to sit beneath it.

Black students and their parents regarded the noose incident as a hate crime and demanded that the white perpetrators be expelled, but school officials dismissed the incident as a prank and issued lesser punishments. A series of fights ensued between black and white youths, and civil rights leaders asserted that the schools and the courts in Jena treated black students more harshly than whites for comparable offenses.

After the Jena story gained national attention in the spring, Walters backed away from the attempted murder charges and instead charged the six teenagers with aggravated second-degree battery and conspiracy. He tried Bell on those charges as an adult in June and won a conviction, but an appeals court reversed the verdict in September, ruling that Bell should have been prosecuted as a juvenile.

Since then, Walters has come under growing political pressure to conclude the Jena Six cases.

Local leaders have been dreading a drawn-out series of criminal trials that would keep Jena in the spotlight throughout 2008.

And Louisiana’s outgoing governor, Kathleen Babineaux Blanco, directly pressed Walters not to pursue an appeal of the decision that struck down Bell’s adult conviction.

Walters did not address the question of political pressure, but he said in a statement Monday that he hoped to have the remaining Jena Six cases resolved early next year.

“My goal and intention has always been to find appropriate justice for Justin Barker, and I believe this plea accomplishes that,” Walters said.

Before Walters made his plea offer, Bell’s lawyers said they had been preparing pretrial motions seeking to recuse both the prosecutor and Mauffray from the case. The lawyers said evidence contained in those motions would have embarrassed both men.

“A trial would be very bad for the town, very bad for Reed Walters, very bad for anybody in Jena associated with the process, and it could turn out very bad for the defendants as well,” said Alan Bean, head of a civil rights group called Friends of Justice and the first activist to call attention to the Jena case.

Parents on both sides of the case agreed.

“If the district attorney makes an offer to us and my son doesn’t have to do any jail time, that would be fine,” said Tina Jones, who insists her son, defendant Bryant Purvis, was not involved in the school attack. “I’m ready to get this all over with.”

Plea bargains “would be the best solution, as long as they don’t get away with no punishment at all,” said David Barker, father of Justin Barker, the school beating victim. “This case has taken its toll on everybody. Justin has ulcers now. Letting it drag on for years would just be additional stress for him.”

Bell’s lawyers said they agreed to the plea bargain to spare the former high school football star the danger of being convicted of more serious charges.

In October, Mauffray sentenced Bell to 18 months in a juvenile facility for four prior juvenile convictions for battery and destruction of property.

But under the terms of Monday’s plea agreement, that time will be served concurrently with the new 18-month sentence, and Bell will get credit for the nine months he spent in jail while awaiting trial.

His lawyers said he could be released by June.

For activism and more info:
http://www.freethejena6.org/